Doctors need not fear now while treating MLCs


By Vikas Vaidya


Remember? When Sanjay Dutt in ‘Munnabhai MBBS’ asks doctor to treat seriously injured patient, he asks to fill up the form. Dutt being hero of the movie forces the doctor to take the patient. But practically speaking no doctor could dare to treat the person of medico-legal case due to the fear of visiting court frequently. Now, Dr Vedprakash Mishra committee has come out with the proforma, filling which doctors need not visit court, plus they would happily treat such patients. Doctors heaved a sigh of relief after the passage of 11 years when Supreme Court delivered the judgement in Parmanand Katara verses Union of India.
It may be noted that in the case of Pt. Parmanand Katara v. Union of India, the Medical Council of India (MCI) has submitted and that has been recorded in the judgment of the Supreme Court as under: “It is further submitted that it is for the Government of India to take necessary and immediate steps to amend various provisions of law which come in the way of Government Doctors as well as other doctors in private hospitals or public hospitals to attend the injured/serious persons immediately without waiting for the police report or completion of police formalities. They should be free from fear that they would be unnecessarily harassed or prosecuted for doing his duty without first complying with the police formalities. It is further submitted that a doctor should not feel himself handicapped in extending immediate help in such cases fearing that he would be harassed by the Police or dragged to Court in such a case. It is submitted that Evidence Act should also be so amended as to provide that the Doctor’s diary maintained in regular course by him in respect of the accident cases would be accepted by the courts in evidence without insisting the doctors being present to prove the same or subject himself to cross-examination/ harassment for long period of time.”
The Council after consultation with the representatives of the Indian Medical Association (IMA) has prepared the format for Medico-legal cases that may be included as an Annexure to the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002.
In order that, this record be considered as evidence in Court’s proceedings, without requiring the concerned registered medical practitioner to attend Court’s proceedings, it must be ensured that the Record is legible. Therefore, a typed copy of the record should be submitted to the Court. Further, in criminal cases, information regarding the nature of injury is crucial. Therefore, in the Medico-Legal Case Sheet/Doctor’s Diary that is prepared the Registered Medical Practitioner should clearly record: (i)Findings, (ii) Diagnosis, (iii) Reasons for declaring the injury as simple/grievous,
(iv) Whether such injury is caused by accident/assault/unascertainable.  
A proposal in this regard if deemed appropriate may be drafted by the Ministry of Law and Justice for amending the Indian Evidence Act, 1972, in a time bound manner considering the requirement of criminal investigation and trial. The above proposal has been transmitted to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India for appropriate action at their end.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

foreign returned MBBS students not to be admitted in PG in State quota

Scrub Typhus's first caseconfirmed from Central India

Dr Vilas Dangre advises "Don’t humiliate yourself by demanding to practice allopathy"